Conflicting Cultures Will Affect Google Maps Wiki Approach
Thursday, August 20th, 2009
Techcrunch just published an interesting post on the importance of a user-generated content strategy for Google Maps to expand. This goal is being achieved thanks to the map creation tool Map Maker from Google:
while Map Maker doesn’t work in places like the U.S. and other well mapped-out areas of the world, you can edit things on U.S. maps such as place locations. It seems clear that Google Maps is a wiki of sorts now, meaning the community is responsible for a lot of the data on it.
It is interesting to picture the world as being mapped all over again. It seems like the work had already been done those past 500 years, by both scientific explorers and satellites. We are standing right now in the same world discovery stage, but in the digital revolution era. And instead of sending explorers all over the world to update info, the world knowledge digitizer (aka Google) relies on the locals to report that info to the mother ship chip.
Google has rarely been more challenged in its mission than in providing maps and local information to users in countries where there has never been any detailed digital map. (from Google Latlong blog)
I bet! the main challenge remains to decide if you can trust the people who will build that knowledge for you. In the old days, you could send a bunch of smart scientists around the world and you knew that you would get a fairly loyal representation of the world in return. Today, what would be the motivation for someone to spend endless hours building knowledge for the account of one multi-billionaire corporation?
Many NGOs also depend on a good base map to plan and execute their work. So much so that many NGOs have told us that they either cannot do their work without good maps or have to spend a lot of effort building these. (from the Google Africa Blog)
Well done Google! NGOs are trustworthy, and they need technology partners. And they’re free educated manpower.
Another issue that Google has yet to figure out is this: With all things equal, if two map-makers build a map of the same place, but with different data on it, who should Google trust? This model has its limit: Google came close to a big diplomatic incident just a few days ago because of their maps. I am really curious to see how this project will come along in Africa: The country is known for its geo-politic instability. Google will have to deal with those issues at one point in the development of Maps. How will they stand in this equation? They’re obviously going to have to take sides, and I’m curious to see how creatively they will approach this dilemma.








